Legal Opinion

Joann Coal Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1989No. 88-2874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Senior Circuit Judge:

This is a suit for the refund of excise taxes paid by one alleged to have been the “producer” of coal. In the district court, judgment went for the taxpayer, and the United States has appealed.

We reverse.

I

The Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977, see 26 U.S.C.A. § 4121 (1989), imposed an excise tax upon producers of coal for the purpose of funding black lung benefits to miners who would not be compensated directly by their employers.

The statute does not define the term “producer” but Treas. Reg. § 48.4121-l(a)(l) (1988) defines it as “the person in whom is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClure v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bostic v. BosticSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  3. United States Coal & Oil Co. v. HarrisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Emerald International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Grant v. Rose (In Re Tidewater Sand Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  3. Dichter-Mad Family Partners v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. In re TerraVia Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Walsh v. J.B. Hunt Transport IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API