Legal Opinion
Hall v. Hawaiian Pineapple Co.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 19, 1947No. Civ. 801-804PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
These cases grow out of a situation developed as a result of a strike in the Hawaiian pineapple industry. They are based upon the Civil Rights Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 43, and consequently 28 U.S.C.A. §. 41 (14) gives this Court jurisdiction.
They are unpopular cases not alone because they involve picketing, present serious and somewhat novel questions of federal labor and constitutional law, but also because restraining orders issued in two of the cases indirectly resulted in what seemed to be a conflict between this Court and a Territorial court.
Soon after the strike…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. AckermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1949
- Nora Garcia v. William GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Alesna v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947
- Nora Garcia v. William GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.