Legal Opinion
Bissell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2008No. 07-36099PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Alan Bissell and Maureen Lee Bissell appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action and imposition of sanctions and costs against them. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
A. Evidentiary Rulings
The district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of the bench trial to incidents alleged to have occurred on August 9, 1996; September 11, 1996; and September 16, 2006. See Payne v. Norwest Corp., 185 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.1999) (“We review the district court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion and will not reverse unless…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jay R. Bishop, United States of America v. Gene R. CardenazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lorraine Detabali v. St. Luke's Hospital John Williams Philip Gardner Christine Green Evangeline Mondares Susan McCorquodale Rose ReneeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Walker v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Payne v. Norwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Pleasure Point Marina, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015