Legal Opinion
Crane Sec. Techs., Inc. v. Ab
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 23, 2018No. Civil Action No. 14-12428-LTSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Leo T. Sorokin, United States District Judge
In this intellectual property dispute, Plaintiffs Crane Security Technologies, Inc. and Visual Physics, LLC (together, "Crane") alleged that Defendant Rolling Optics AB ("RO") infringed five of Crane's patents. RO moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and the Court denied that motion. Doc. No. 34. RO then asserted defenses and counterclaims for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement. The Court held a hearing pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rasmussen Instruments, LLC v. DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Western Plastics, Inc. v. DuBose Strapping, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020