Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 6, 1960No. 18537PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Defendants in error, plaintiffs below, filed a complaint in the district court seeking damages allegedly sustained by plaintiffs when an automobile driven by defendant Hamm collided with a motor vehicle owned by plaintiff Florence Turner and driven by plaintiff Jamie Thompson. The complaint named as defendants, Hamm, and Universal Mutual Casualty Company (hereinafter referred to as Universal Mutual or Company). It was alleged that the negligence of defendant Hamm caused said collision and that he “was an agent, employee or servant of defendant Universal Mutual Casualty Company and (was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Losito v. Kruse, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Otis Elevator Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  3. Granquist v. Crystal Springs Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Spurlock v. Boyce-Harvey MacHineryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Parrish v. De RemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hill Ex Rel. Greer v. McDonaldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Mountain Mobile Mix, Inc. v. GiffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. FrackeltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Brochner v. Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. RINGSBYT TRUCK LINES, INC. v. BradfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API