Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grand River Dam Authority v. Eaton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1990No. 75022Published

1DissentAlma Wilson, J.

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice, with whom KAUGER, Justice, joins, concurring in denying the motion to dismiss and dissenting from the court’s opinion.

Today the court denies the appellee’s motion to dismiss and holds that a judgment debtor’s voluntary satisfaction of the adjudicated obligation no longer operates to bar an appeal unless the payment was “made with the intent to compromise or settle the matter.” Although I also would deny the appellee’s quest for this appeal’s dismissal, I cannot accede to the court’s pronouncement. There is here no need for changing the court’s jurisprudence. As the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Hayes v. . NourseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Fulreader v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API