Legal Opinion

Nicks v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 17, 2000No. 1990363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEE, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed. In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving the discussion, or the analysis, of the substantive-competency issue in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. See Card v. Dugger, 911 F.2d 1494, 1519-20 (11th Cir.1990)(noting that, in addressing a substantive-competency issue, a reviewing court should not limit its review to the evidence of competency that was before the trial court).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, LYONS, BROWN, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., concurs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James Armando Card v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. DeBruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Dowdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Dowdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API