Nicks v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SEE, Justice.
The writ of certiorari is quashed. In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving the discussion, or the analysis, of the substantive-competency issue in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. See Card v. Dugger, 911 F.2d 1494, 1519-20 (11th Cir.1990)(noting that, in addressing a substantive-competency issue, a reviewing court should not limit its review to the evidence of competency that was before the trial court).
WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, LYONS, BROWN, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., concurs…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- James Armando Card v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- DeBruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Dowdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Dowdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.