Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Fitzpatrick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8740PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— This was a suit by Fitzpatrick against Boyce, for an injury sustained by Fitzpatrick, while working at a flax-brake in Boyce’s factory.

The suit was commenced against Boyce and his foreman, Dunlap, but was dismissed as to Dunlap; it went to trial by a jury, upon a third paragraph of complaint, a general denial thereof, and a special defence denied by the plaintiff; the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with $500 damages; the defendant’s motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, were overruled ; judgment was rendered upon the verdict and the defendant appealed.

*527The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Hayden v. Smithville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  3. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Gibson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. Ryan v. . FowlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API