Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1985No. 53 M.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

Given the substantial public importance of the question ¡involved in these consolidated appeals, and the scant and evenly divided authority existing thereon, we have deemed it appropriate to grant discretionary review. In this case of first impression, we are concerned, primarily, with a matter of statutory construction in which the intent of the Legislature is controlling. After evidence was presented before a hearing officer, all Appellees were granted general assistance benefits as transitionally needy persons.1 This decision was upheld by the Department of Public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. Mack Bros. Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Fisher v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Nikolaidis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. LassiterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Elder v. OrluckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Cimino v. Valley Family MedicineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API