Fisher v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
Given the substantial public importance of the question ¡involved in these consolidated appeals, and the scant and evenly divided authority existing thereon, we have deemed it appropriate to grant discretionary review. In this case of first impression, we are concerned, primarily, with a matter of statutory construction in which the intent of the Legislature is controlling. After evidence was presented before a hearing officer, all Appellees were granted general assistance benefits as transitionally needy persons.1 This decision was upheld by the Department of Public…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. Mack Bros. Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Fisher v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Nikolaidis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. LassiterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Elder v. OrluckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Cimino v. Valley Family MedicineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.