Legal Opinion

Adams v. Nat'l Bank of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1993No. 93463, (Calendar No. 16)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The question presented is whether the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act1 precludes the Adams estate from maintaining causes of action against the National Bank of Detroit arising out of the arrest of Michael Bret Adams.

Adams, an employee of the National Bank of Detroit, was erroneously arrested on a charge of making fraudulent withdrawals from nbd. The withdrawals had actually been made by another nbd employee, Michael Ansara Adams.

*333Adams was arrested after Mary Miller Mach, an nbd employee, had erroneously given the police his address and phone number. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Boscaglia v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Graham v. FordMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API