Town of Wahnena v. Dorholt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the denial of a motion for amended findings, contending the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s determination that a road located on private property was a public way. Minn.Stat. § 160.05, subd. 1 (1988). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Donald Dorholt owns land on the east side of section 27 and the adjoining west side of section 26 in the Town of Wahnena. It is undisputed that a public town road exists on the southern half of the section line dividing the two sections. The parties disagree on the status of the north half of this section…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Anderson v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Shinneman v. Arago TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Bengtson v. Village of Marine on St. CroixSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Ravenna Township v. GrunsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Resolution Denying Stoick Creek, LLC's Application for a Second DrivewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023