Legal Opinion

Application of Texas Co.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided June 5, 1939No. 55D, 56D, 57DPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The present applications seek to quash the grand jury subpoenas heretofore issued and to restrain the Government and its prosecuting officials from presenting certain witnesses and documents included in the subpoenas.

To appreciate fully the legal effect of the applications I think it well to revert briefly to some of the elementary principles of our form of government.

There are three departments. Upon the Congress and upon it alone devolves the responsibility of determining the wisdom and policy of legislation. The Executive may recommend legislation, and so may other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  2. The PEOPLE v. SearsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United States v. Vincent Moran DossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  4. Application of United Electrical, Radio & M. WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  5. United States v. United States District Court for Southern District of West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API