Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. Sears

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1971No. 44287, 44288, 44299, and 44383PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Barnabas F. Sears, hereafter called Sears, alleging that constitutional issues are involved (Rule 302 (a)), and that the case is one of extraordinary importance (Rule 302(d) ), appeals directly to this court from two orders of the circuit court of Cook County adjudging him guilt)' of contempt. We allowed the joint motion of Sears and six organizations for leave to file original petitions for writs of mandamus and prohibition (Rule 381), and although separately argued, we have sua sponte consolidated the appeals and the original actions for consideration and opinion.

The record…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re FriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. People v. IannielloNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. In Re May 1991 Will County Grand JuryIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. NewberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Phillips v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States v. HubbardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API