Legal Opinion

State v. Suncrest Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, O. J.

The point presented for our consideration is the construction of C. S., 3480, Which provides that “No railroad company shall permit the loading or unloading of any freight car on Sunday; nor shall it permit any car, train of cars or locomotive to be run on Sunday on any railroad, save in case of accident, except such as may be run for the purpose of .transporting the United States mail, passengers with their baggage, and ordinary express freight in express cars exclusively, and except such as may be run for the purpose of transporting fruits, vegetables, livestock, and perishable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Hemphill v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Ward Ex Rel. Ward v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. State v. PulliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bizzell Ex Rel. Bizzell v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Bizzell Ex Rel. Bizzell v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Craig v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. State v. YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API