Brundage v. Borchard
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Charles Lambíase, J.
Petitioners, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, have moved “for an order reversing, annulling, and setting aside the order heretofore made on the *21030th day of November, 1961, and for such other and further relief"as to this court may seem just and proper.” (Notice of motion dated Dec. 7, 1961.)
Intervenor-respondent, Mary Wiley, who was allowed to intervene herein by order dated January 16, 1962, resides at 204 Avondale Road, in the Town of Irondcquoit, New York, and her interest therein, it seems, is a life tenancy. On September 25, 1961 she made application to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Matter of Levy v. Bd. of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of Reed v. Bd. of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Young Women's Hebrew Ass'n v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.