Legal Opinion
Young Women's Hebrew Ass'n v. Board of Standards & Appeals
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1935PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.
The intervener respondent is the owner of premises at the northwest corner of Fifth avenue and One Hundred and Tenth street, Manhattan, city of New York. The property is wholly within a district zoned for business. “In a business district no building or premises shall be used, and no building shall be erected which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, for any of the following specified trades, industries or uses: * * * (46) Gasoline service station.” (Amended Building Zone Resolution, § 4; see New York Code of Ordinances, Appendix B.)
The Board of Standards and Appeals is empowered in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Prusik v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Matter of Eckels v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- People Ex Rel. Arseekay Syndicate, Inc. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Matter of Chizner v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Matter of Levy v. Bd. of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.