Legal Opinion

Eugene Keith Sulie v. Jack Duckworth and Indiana Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 31, 1989No. 87-1321PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, Eugene Sulie, asks us to review the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Sulie’s petition after finding that the issues raised in the petition were identical to those raised in a prior petition already considered and rejected by both the district court and this court. Concluding that Sulie had not supplement ed his second petition for habeas relief with a colorable claim of factual innocence, as required under Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436, 106 S.Ct. 2616, 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986), the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Theodore Abbott Jones v. Gary Stotts, Mike Nelson, and Attorney General of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Burchette v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Charles Lindgren v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Leroy Thomas, Jr. v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Steve Shore v. Warden, Stateville PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API