Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Target Corporation

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 29, 2020No. 9:19-cv-81108Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:19-cv-81108-ROSENBERG/REINHART MARIA ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION and JANE GREER, Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TARGET CORPORATION’S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Target Corporation’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. DE 46. The Court has carefully considered the Motion, Plaintiff’s Response thereto [DE 56], Defendant’s Reply [DE 58], and the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. David W. Ellis, Jr. v. Gordon R. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Reginald Jones v. UPS Group FreightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Myra Furcron v. Mail Centers Plus, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API