Legal Opinion

Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. Lewis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 24, 1932No. Nos. 27, 28, 29, 30PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

After interlocutory injunction had been granted, these cases went respectively to final hearing upon motions to dismiss the bills of complaint, and these were dismissed solely upon the ground that plaintiffs had an adequate remedy at law. The Court is of the opinion that the decision cannot be sustained merely upon the face of the statute invoked (Kentucky Acts of 1930, c. 149, § 10) in view of the allegations of the bills of complaint that the only remedy provided is to obtain warrants upon the General Fund of the State in the hands of the State Treasurer to be paid if and when funds are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. DaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. State Budget Commission v. LebusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Eisley v. MohanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. H. W. Denton and International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, CIO v. City of Carrollton, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Adams County v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Zaragoza-GomezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API