Legal Opinion

People v. Markus

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1978No. Crim. 16650PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

Appellant was charged with and convicted of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). No allegation was made that appellant actually committed a breaking and entering of a structure with intent to commit a felony or petit larceny. His guilt as a principal rests upon his activity as an aider and abettor (Pen. Code, § 31).

At the outset, we note there is no question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding of guilt as aider and abettor. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to respondent, as required, it is clear that appellant’s behavior comports well with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. MorlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. JardineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API