Legal Opinion

State v. Saucier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 22, 1980PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Defendant Richard R. Saucier appeals from a conviction for Class C gross sexual misconduct in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(2)(B) (1979). 1 That statute imposes criminal liability on anyone who compels or induces another person, not his spouse, to engage in sexual intercourse or a sexual act (defined in 17-A M.R.S.A. § 251(1)(C)) by means of any threat. The indictment followed the language of the statute. 2 Defendant contends that the indictment failed to charge an offense because it lacked a description of the threat he was charged with making, failed to indicate that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThibodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. State v. HoltSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. State v. SampsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. StoddardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. PickeringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. State v. SnowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. GiglioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API