Legal Opinion

Hudson Oil Co. v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1964No. 43,795 and 43,796 (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcheb, C.:

This appeal stems from two consolidated actions. One was a mandamus action to compel the Board of City Commissioners of the City of Wichita, Kansas to approve a plat of plain-tiEs’ tract of land in the city. The other was a mandamus action to compel the Board of City Commissioners of the City of Wichita and the Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Commission to rezone plaintiEs’ tract.

The facts are not in dispute.

PlaintiEs own property in the City of Wichita with a frontage of 570 feet abutting the south side of Kellogg…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. West v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Ford v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. City of Wichita v. SchwertnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arkenberg v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Sweetman v. Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  3. Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Ventures in Property I v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Zupancic v. SchimenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API