Hudson Oil Co. v. City of Wichita
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hatcheb, C.:
This appeal stems from two consolidated actions. One was a mandamus action to compel the Board of City Commissioners of the City of Wichita, Kansas to approve a plat of plain-tiEs’ tract of land in the city. The other was a mandamus action to compel the Board of City Commissioners of the City of Wichita and the Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Commission to rezone plaintiEs’ tract.
The facts are not in dispute.
PlaintiEs own property in the City of Wichita with a frontage of 570 feet abutting the south side of Kellogg…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- West v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Ford v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- City of Wichita v. SchwertnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arkenberg v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Sweetman v. Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Ventures in Property I v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Zupancic v. SchimenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.