Legal Opinion

Cameron Estates, Inc. v. Deering

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to determine a claim to approximately 559 acres of land in Suffolk County, the appeal is from the judgment in favor of plaintiff. Certain of the defendants also bring up for review two intermediate orders, the first of which denied said defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the third amended complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the *986second of which denied, without prejudice, plaintiff’s motion to amend the third amended complaint. Judgment modified on the law and the facts so as to except and exclude from the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Bryan v. . McGurkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Pope v. . HanmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Seafire, Inc. v. AckersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Seafire Inc. v. AckersonNew York Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cameron Estates, Inc. v. DeeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Krol v. EckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. New York & Brooklyn Suburban Investment Co. v. LeedsNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kassam Corp. v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Snyder v. BistrianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API