Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Butler
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1973No. 11341PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
The City of Phoenix, Petitioner, sought by the filing of a petition for special action to prevent the enforcement of a judgment by the Respondent Judge Pro Tempore which declared A.R.S. § 16-844(1) un*161constitutional and which judgment ordered the City to revise the instructions to voters on the ballots to be used at the primary election of November 13, 1973. After hearing arguments on the petition, we accepted jurisdiction and granted the petition of the City. A formal written order was issued preventing the enforcement of the judgment below, and we noted that a formal written…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Terry v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Evans v. CornmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch PublicArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Richardson v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Cecilia M Lewis Et Vir v. Ray C Debord Et UxArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.