Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Abeles
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This motion for an injunction pendente lite presents a contest between rival labor unions and a contention between one of those unions and a cluster of employers.
The plaintiff is Moving Picture Machine Operators Union, Local 306, of International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Machine Operators of the United States and Canada, a voluntary association of more than seven persons. (It will be referred to hereinafter as Local 306.) This local and its former competitor, but now ally, Empire State Motion Picture Operators Union, Inc. (hereinafter called Empire), dominate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Willy v. . MulledyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- McCord v. Thompson-Starrett Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Grassi Contracting Co. v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Darweger v. StaatsNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- De Agostina v. HolmdenNew York Supreme Court · 1935
- Stokes v. Newtown Creek Coal & Coke Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
- Stokes v. Newtown Creek Coal & Coke Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934