Legal Opinion

East Franklin Township Overseers v. Rayburn Township Overseers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1903No. Appeal, No. 111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 111, April T., 1903, by defendants, from judgment of Q. S. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1901, No. 20, on appeal from order of removal in case of Overseers of the Poor of East Eranklin Township v. Overseers of the Poor of Rayburn Township. Appeal from order of removal. Before Thomas, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Errors assigned were to various findings of fact and conclusions of law.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

At the conclusion of the first opinion of the court below, quashing the order of removal in this case, and of the second opinion dismissing the appeal therefrom and ordering the appellant to pay to the appellee the sum of $341.61, the amount *523expended by it for tbe support of tbe pauper removed, and legal expenses, etc., there occurs a general allowance of exceptions as follows: “ Exception to the findings of fact, conclusions of law, answers of points and the order of court is hereby noted and a bill sealed for each party.”

In Spring Twp. Overseers v. Walker Twp.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Overseers of the Poor of Elderton Borough v. Overseers of the Poor of Plumcreek TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Overseers of the Poor of Spring Township v. Overseers of the Poor of Walker TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Overseers of Liberty Township v. Overseers of Castanea TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mifflin Township Poor District v. Schuylkill County Poor DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Shrewsbury Township Poor District v. Penn Township Poor DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API