Dick v. General Assembly of Order of Amaranth
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Emma Dick against the General Assembly of the Order of the Amaranth on a mutual benefit certificate. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.
Plaintiff brought suit as beneficiary under a certain certificate issued by defendant order to her deceased husband, John A. Dick, June 19, 1895. Upon the trial a verdict was directed by the court against plaintiff. Prom a judgment entered upon such verdict the case is brought before us for review. The facts of the case necessary to be stated in order to understand the questions at issue, are very few.
John A. Dick, a resident of Detroit, was initiated into defendant order, June 17, 1895. The certificate was issued to him and he continued to remain a member in good and regular standing, as is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Petherick v. General Assembly of OrderMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Kuhl v. MeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- People v. FlynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Lemp v. RavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Homann v. Allgemeiner Arbeiter BundMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Sumerlin v. American Fraternal StarsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Roulo v. Schiller BundMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- True v. OlderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Brockway v. Michigan Mutual Hail InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921