Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Vaught

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1934No. 1296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Justice.

Mrs. Dorcas Vaught instituted this suit against M. M. Myers, C. M. Armstrong, and Mack Hill on four past-due promissory notes for $100 each, interest, etc. The notes wore payable to S. B. Vaught, and executed and delivered to him by M. M. Myers. The notes were part of the purchase price of, and secured by a lien on, a lot in New Hobbs, N. M. Plaintiff alleged that, subsequently to the delivery of the notes, Armstrong and Hill, for a consideration, “contracted and agreed to pay said four notes,” etc.; that they assumed the notes in the purchase of the lot; that “plaintiff is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Aycock v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whisenant v. Thompson Bros. Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API