Smith v. Goguen
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in the judgmentJustice White
It is a crime in Massachusetts if one mutilates, tramples, defaces or “treats contemptuously” the flag of the United States. Appellee Goguen was convicted of treating the flag contemptuously, the evidence being that he wore a likeness of the flag on the seat of his pants. The Court holds this portion of the statute too vague to provide an ascertainable standard of guilt in any situation, including this one. Although I concur in the judgment of affirmance for other reasons, I cannot agree with this rationale.1
*584I
It is self-evident that there is a whole range of conduct that anyone with at least…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.