Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1965No. 14387PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This appeal relates to the volenti non fit injuria concept of assumed risk. Plaintiffs, Selma Kelley and husband, John Kelley, appeal from a summary judgment granted defendant, Mrs. Helen C. Alexander, d/b/a Beekman’s Roto-Rooter Sewer Service, in a suit to recover damages sustained by plaintiff Mrs. Kelley when she fell in a hole in her yard which had been dug by defendant’s employees. The motion for summary judgment was based on the pleadings and deposition of Mrs. Kelley. 1

On March 26, 1962, defendant was employed by plaintiffs to remove roots from a sewer line on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Eaton v. R. B. George Investment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Dee v. ParishTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Sinclair Refining Company v. WinderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Reddick v. LongacreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Snellenberger v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Adair v. the Island ClubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Edward Taylor v. Carolyn Marie BairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Pifer v. Muse, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  5. Conaway v. Roberts, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API