Legal Opinion

United States v. Price

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided May 15, 1981No. Civ. 80-73-APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

STUART, Chief Judge.

This action was initiated by the United States to recover from the executors of the Estate of Marie Price Reel the full amount of an assessment for unpaid estate taxes. The executors tendered “flower bonds” 1 which, if accepted at par value as required by the terms, would have satisfied the tax obligation. The United States refused to accept the bonds claiming the conditions for acceptance at par were not met because the decedent did not own the bonds at her death. The claim of non-ownership is based upon the fact that the bonds were purchased by her agent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of Watson v. BlumenthalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Estate of Pfohl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  3. Reeves v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Dean v. Estate of AtwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. United States v. MannyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Trepanier v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Linda I. Peterson as Trustee of the Linda I. Peterson Revocable Trust, Mark Peterson and Linda Peterson v. Kay Dorothy Pohren AdamCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API