United States v. Griffin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Claude Griffin, Jr., and Maxon Morgan appeal their convictions of cocaine trafficking. They contend that their Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process was denied when the district court refused to allow them to call a witness before the jury for the sole purpose of having him invoke an invalid privilege against self-incrimination. Because the Sixth Amendment recognizes no such right, we affirm.
I
In 1993, Claude Griffin, Sr., hatched a plan to import cocaine into the United States with the assistance of his son, Claude Griffin, Jr., Maxon Morgan, and others.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Emanuel JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Roberto Gomez-Rojas, and Michael Rece SutherlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Charles Lidge Bolts and Joe Dee HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Marcelle LacoutureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HaddadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- State of West Virginia v. Daniel L. HerbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. CrawfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.