Legal Opinion
State v. Crawford
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 2007No. 24077, 24088PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Nathaniel Crawford (Crawford) was found guilty by a jury of aiding and abetting distribution of a controlled substance. He was acquitted on possession of a controlled substance. After the trial court sentenced him to eight years in the penitentiary, he appealed. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] In 2004, there was a concerted effort by local law enforcement officers and Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) agents to stop drug activity in southeastern South Dakota. This case derives from an investigation of drug activity in and around Yankton, SD.
[¶ 3.] DCI was using a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BowkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. DuboisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CondonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SpaniolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.