Legal Opinion

Estate of Bell v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of North Carolina

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1993No. 9227SC263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. William Bell was a disabled veteran and was entitled to Veterans Administration (VA) benefits. Among those benefits was an obligation to pay for medical care rendered to a veteran in a non-VA facility, for so long as necessary to stabilize the veteran’s condition. Under the then-active VA directives, when a veteran was stable enough to be transported by ambulance to a VA facility, a bed would be offered to the veteran at the VA facility. If the veteran refused the bed, then the VA’s obligation to pay for medical care rendered by a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Christ Lutheran Church Ex Rel. Matthews v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Harry's Cadillac-Pontiac-GMC Truck Co., Inc. v. Motors Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Sykes v. VixamarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. Christ Lutheran Church Ex Rel. Matthews v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API