Ehret-Day Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Tyson, Judge:
The first question presented is whether the income from the two construction contracts described in the findings of fact should be taxed as part of the petitioner’s income for the year 1938. Article 42-4 of Regulations 101, promulgated under the Revenue Act of 1938, permits the reporting of income from long term contracts “for the taxable year in which the contract is finally completed and accepted if the taxpayer elects as a consistent practice so to treat such income, provided such method clearly reflects the net income.” The provisions of that article, which have been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Feeney v. BardsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- Sargeant Bros., Inc. v. BrancatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- MacDonnell v. VitilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Globe Home Improvement Co. v. MichniskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- "White" Door Bed Co. v. United States Mortgage & Title Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929