Legal Opinion

Goldfarb v. Herman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

Defendant has moved to vacate a warrant of attachment levied by the sheriff upon orchestral arrangements and upon sums claimed to be owing from a restaurant at which defendant, leader of a “ name band ”, and his said band are playing. The defendant claims insufficiency of the affidavit upon which the warrant was secured. This question of a claimed deficiency has been removed by the submission of a supplemental affidavit, which is a procedure authorized under section 822 of the Civil Practice Act.

The sheriff’s levy upon tangible personal property excluded all of defendant’s own musical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris Plan Ind. Bank of N.Y. v. GunningNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. In Re the Claim of CamgrosNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by CamgrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Karnik v. HuttonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glaser v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API