Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. Standard Homeopathic Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided September 28, 2018No. Case No. 16-CV-8687 (KMK)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Jennifer O'Neill ("O'Neill") and Tricia Zamfino ("Zamfino") bring the instant Complaint, on their own behalf and on behalf of a putative class, alleging that they were injured by paying for unsafe products that have since been voluntarily removed from the marketplace by Defendants Standard Homeopathic Company ("Standard") and Hyland's, Inc. ("Hyland's"), and which are no longer available for purchase at Defendants Target Corporation ("Target") or CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ("CVS") (collectively "Defendants"). (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 1-3 (Dkt. No. 20).) According to…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Anderson v. Tether Holdings LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Bayne v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Broccoli v. AshworthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Brodie v. Green Spot Foods, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Gonzalez Rodriguez v. Walmart Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.