Legal Opinion

United States v. McLeod

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 9, 1994No. 93-0771; CMR No. 9102729PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This Court granted review to consider whether appellant was entitled to an additional 3 days of credit toward the service of his sentence to confinement, because of an untimely review of probable cause to confine him. See County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 111 S.Ct. 1661, 114 L.Ed.2d 49 (1991); ROM 305(k), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. Having considered the evidence, vve conclude that appellant’s confinement was reviewed in a timely manner, and we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.

Appellant was ordered into pretrial confinement by his company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. LynchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. RexroatUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. McLeodU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RobersonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. SchefferUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. KempNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. DingwallArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API