Legal Opinion

First Universalist Church v. Pungs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by the First Universalist Church against William A. Pungs to recover the amount of a subscription. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The parties to this cause do not disagree upon the facts. Plaintiff is an incorporated church society. In February, 1880, by a written lease, it leased the property now occupied by its church edifice from the McKinstry estate for an annual rental of $250, payable quarterly. The lease contained an option under which the land and building thereon might become the property •of the church upon its giving to the McKinstry estate written notice of its intention to purchase on or before April 1, 1894, and upon payment of a price to be •determined in the following manner: Each party to the lease to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. DuffieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Underwood v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Comstock v. HowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Habirshaw Electric Cable Co. v. Habirshaw Electric Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. Harvey v. Security Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Waters v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Estate of Dodge v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  5. In Re Upper Peninsula Development BureauMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API