Legal Opinion

J. T. v. O'Rourke in & for Tenth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 27, 1982No. 82SA152-82SA154, 82SA157-82SA164, 82SA151, 82SA155 and 82SA156PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

We issued a rule to show cause under C.A.R. 21 in fourteen consolidated petitions in which the petitioners contend that the Pueblo District Court erred in denying their motions for a preliminary hearing because they were not detained pending their adjudicatory hearings. We now make the rule to show cause absolute in J. T. v. O’Rourke (S.Ct. No. 82SA152); L. J. v. O’Rourke; L. S. v. O’Rourke; G. D. v. O’Rourke; M. C. v. O’Rourke; P. T. v. O'Rourke; R. P. v. O’Rourke; R. R. v. O’Rourke; R. V. v. O’Rourke; S. G. v. O’Rourke; and T. B. v. O’Rourke; and discharge the rule in J.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. CzemerynskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. State v. Hezzie R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. FlickingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API