Legal Opinion

AT&T Corp. v. Ruth Johnson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 8, 2004No. M2003-00148-COA-R3-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CainWilliam B. Cain, J.

in which WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S., and PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, J., joined.

This appeal concerns a challenge to the Commissioner’s franchise and excise tax assessment. On cross-motions for summary judgment the chancellor found for the Commissioner. We affirm.

In this appeal, AT & T challenges the Commissioner’s assessments of franchise and excise tax for tax years 1991 through 1996. In its amended and supplemented complaint filed pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-1-1801, AT & T challenged first the Commissioner’s refusal to allow credits for net operating losses and…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nutt v. Champion International Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. City of Chattanooga v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Covington Pike Toyota, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HuddlestonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API