City of Tulsa v. Wicker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Tulsa County; N. J. Gubser, Judge. Action by Mrs. R. L. Wicker against'the City of Tulsa, a municipal corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RITTENHOUSE, C.
Plaintiff in error will be •designated as defendant, and defendant in error will be designated as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial • court.
This action was brought by plaintiff against defendant, city ■■of Tulsa, a municipal corporation, to recover damages for injuries to her person and property, alleged to have been occasioned 'by and through the negligence of the city of Tulsa in not guarding an alleged dangerous excavation at the intersection of Fourth street and Elgin avenue in said city on the 12th day of November, 1909.
During the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Morris v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Lane v. BoicourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. . SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hudman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Hudson v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Dahlquist v. Denver & R. G. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- Lazzell v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- McNamee v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.