Legal Opinion

Miot v. Kechijian

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 15, 1993No. 92-2896-CIVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGHSMITH, District Judge.

OMNIBUS ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the following motions:(1) Defendants Art Kechijian, Nelson P. Kelley, and Larry E. Austin’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction,(2) Defendants’ motion to transfer and for evidentiary hearing.

For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motions.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Sanford B. Miot originally brought this action against Kechijian, Kelley, and Austin in state court. The defendants subsequently removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Hydrokinetics, Inc. v. Alaska Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mason v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  2. Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  3. Meterlogic, Inc. v. Copier Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
  4. Cellularvision Technology & Telecommunications, L.P. v. Alltel Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  5. Delorenzo v. HP Enterprise Services, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API