Legal Opinion

Fairlawn Heights Co. v. Theis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1938No. 26672PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Opposing counsel agree that two remedies were available to the appellant, viz., an action to recover damages for breach of the contract, or an action for specific performance. But here the accord ends, counsel for appellant affirming and counsel for appellee denying the right of appellant to maintain an action on the contract for the balance of the purchase price remaining unpaid.

An examination of the briefs filed in the case of Will-O-Way Development Co. v. Mills, 122 Ohio St., 242, 171 N. E., 94, discloses that counsel in that case presented their argument on the main question of whether…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Black v. American International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Oconto Co. v. BaconWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ewing v. . WightmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Prichard v. MulhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. David L. Auld v. Johnny VinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API