Legal Opinion
Pospisil v. Anderson
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*347OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Goldstein, J.
In their proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (action No. 1), petitioners seek to compel respondent Anderson to issue a default certificate of approval pursuant to Town Law § 276 (4). The proposed subdivision is located in the Town of East Hampton on the north side of Montauk Highway, just east of the Village of East Hampton.
In its order (dated Aug. 18, 1986) which denied respondents’ motion to dismiss and enjoined the Town of East Hampton from rezoning the subject parcel this court narrowed the issues under consideration herein. The questions, simply…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Glen Head — Glenwood Landing Civic Council, Inc. v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sun Beach Real Estate Development Corp. v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Webster Associates v. Town of WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Felner v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Biondi v. RoccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Pospisil v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988