Legal Opinion
Vogel v. W.A. Sandri, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 31, 1995No. 2:93-cv-00284PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(papers 54 and 60)
MURTHA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Vogel, who owns a gas station in Burlington, Vermont, has brought this action against W.A. Sandri, Inc., A.R. Sandri, Inc., and J.W. Sandri, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Sandri”), three corporations collectively involved in supplying the plaintiff with Sunoco-brand fuels. In Count VI of his Second Amended Complaint, the plaintiff asks the Court to declare the parties’ gasoline supply agreement does not constitute a “requirements contract” within the meaning of 9A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,749 Thomas Latimer, Et Ux, Carol Latimer v. Smithkline & French Laboratories, a Division of Smithkline Beckman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Milks DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Bourdeau Bros. v. Montagne (In Re Montagne)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2010
- Fab-Tech, Inc. v. NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Alling v. C.D. Cairns Irrevocable Trusts PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.