Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 2011No. 1100136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYONS, Justice.

Dean Kenneth Hicks, the defendant in an action arising out of a vehicular accident, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct the trial court to vacate its order granting a motion filed by the plaintiff, Virginia Gayle Marshall, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6), Ala. R. Civ. P., for relief from a final judgment in favor of Hicks and reinstating the underlying action to the court’s active docket. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

The vehicular accident underlying this action occurred on May 18, 2002.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Ex Parte Perfection Siding, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. R.E. Grills, Inc. v. DavisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. State ex rel. G.J. v. W.J.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bates v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  2. Frank Gillis, M.D. v. Joey Frazier, as of the Estate of Florine BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. Frank Gillis, M.D. v. Joey Frazier, as of the Estate of Florine BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API