Legal Opinion

Roger v. Milliken

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1921No. 7967Published

1Opinion of the Court

*369Mederic E. Roger vs Milliken and Farwell

Ho.7967

Appeal from Civil District Court, Hon. Hugh C. Cage,Judge.

CHARLES 3?. CLAIBORHE, JUDGE.

This case was before us heretofore and is reported in 14 C£. App. 92. The plaintiff seeks to subject the proceeds of sale of a crop of sugar in the hands of the defendant to his .privileged claim of overseer. He alleged that he had been employed by his father S. E. Roger as overseer to manage his Bellewood Plantation in Assumption Parish for the year 1914;that

"the said S. E. Roger agreed to pay him for his services the sum of One Hundred and twenty-five Dollars…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sayre Borough v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Loeb v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Maxwell-Yerger Co. v. RoganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Swift v. BonvillainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Joseph Weill & Co. v. KentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API