Legal Opinion

Dooley v. City of Cleveland

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Me- Chief Justice Green

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This bill was filed by the complainant to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance of the defendant City and to have that ordinance declared invalid. The chancellor dismissed the bill and the complainant appealed to this court.

The bill avers that complainant is in the business of manufacturing and selling ice cream; that he sells it from a wagon or truck on the streets of Cleveland, and that he operates under a license authorizing such business from the City. It is further set out that the City passed an ordinance prohibiting the use of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Hoover Motor Express Co. v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bagshaw v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Comer v. AsheTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Pickrell v. MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Steil v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API