Legal Opinion
Fairchild Sons, Inc. v. Rogers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 15, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of March 22,1935, made in a peremptory mandamus proceeding, modified by striking therefrom the provision denying the motion of the village trustees and the building inspector to quash the order of October 2, 1933, and by inserting in place thereof a provision granting said motion and as thus modified the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. It is unimportant whether the return to the mandamus order was strictly proper in form in view of the fact that the statements therein are utilized as a basis for the motion to quash the mandamus order of October 2, 1933, which statements…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Ortenberg v. BalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- People ex rel. Ortenberg v. BalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Fox Lane Corp. v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Caponi v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Matter of Fairchild Sons, Inc. v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Deer Park Civic Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Dubow v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Ellington Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Gramatan Hills Manor, Inc. v. ManganielloNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Ambrosio v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.